MIT found that most generative AI projects didn't succeed as intended. This is due to zero return on investment, and resistance to 'friction.'
Chapters
Intro and haircuts
AI hairstylist and barber?
MIT study on GenAI pilot failure
Verification tax
Psychiatrist testimony on LLM's
Friction, time, and effort
David's wooden board and 'barriers to entry'
Comments from viewers
Questions for viewers
Link:
https://mlq.ai/media/quarterly_decks/v0.1_State_of_AI_in_Business_2025_Report.pdf
=========
David Lam and Steve Ispas on Silicon Valley Front Row (SVFR) podcast
#MIT #artificialintelligence #genai
The year is 2025, approaching 2026. Concerns loom over the profitability of ChatGPT, and artificial intelligence systems.Are the massive investments going to pay off?...
Advanced technology from Star Trek has inspired fans and scifi enthusiasts for decades. After more than 50 years since its inception, how close to...
In this episode, David Lam and Steve Ispas discuss how Meta relies heavily on Chinese advertisers (accounting for 10% of total revenue, or nearly...